Beyond Neoliberalism: Insights From Emerging Markets. Brookings Institution. Geoffrey Gertz and Homi Kharas. May 1, 2019
Across Western economies, the future of capitalism is
suddenly up for debate. Driven in part by the twin shocks of Brexit and the
election of Donald Trump, the prevailing neoliberal economic model—which
prioritized a light touch regulatory regime, minimal barriers to trade and
foreign investment, and overall a small role for the state in managing the
economy—is under attack from both the left and the right. Will neoliberalism be
displaced? And what will come next?
Around the world, meanwhile, emerging markets have been
grappling with similar questions for decades. Neoliberalism spread unevenly
across emerging markets, and likewise many of them have been moving beyond
neoliberalism for decades. These varied experiences provide valuable insights
into the strengths and weaknesses of neoliberalism and the future of economic
and political policymaking in a post-neoliberal world. If the Washington
Consensus mantra of “stabilize, privatize, and liberalize” has lost relevance
today, what—if anything—has taken its place? How are different countries reevaluating
the relative roles of states and markets in delivering economic development?
Are there new “models” that are generalizable and applicable across countries
and contexts? [Note: contains copyrighted material].
[PDF format, 109 pages].
News in a Digital Age: Comparing the Presentation of News Information over Time and Across Media Platforms. RAND Corporation. Jennifer Kavanagh et al. May 14, 2019
This report presents a quantitative assessment of how the
presentation of news has changed over the past 30 years and how it varies
across platforms. Using RAND-Lex, a suite of tools that combine machine learning
and text analysis, the researchers considered such linguistic characteristics
as social attitude, sentiment, affect, subjectivity, and relation with
authority for four comparisons: newspapers before and after 2000 (through
2017), broadcast television news before and after 2000 (through 2000),
broadcast news and prime-time cable programming for the period from 2000 to
2017, and newspapers and online journalism during the 2012–2017 period. Over
time, and as society moved from “old” to “new” media, news
content has generally shifted from more-objective event- and context-based
reporting to reporting that is more subjective, relies more heavily on
argumentation and advocacy, and includes more emotional appeals. These changes
were observed across platforms, appearing least significant in the evolution of
print journalism and most stark in comparisons of broadcast news with
prime-time cable programming and of print journalism with online journalism.
The report quantifies the sizes of observed changes and provides examples of
what these changes look like in context. It also includes a discussion of the
implications of these trends for the changing media ecosystem and for Truth
Decay—the term RAND uses to refer to the diminishing role of facts and analysis
in political discourse. [Note: contains copyrighted
[PDF format, 244 pages].
Real Wage Trends, 1979 to 2016. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Sarah A. Donovan, David H. Bradley. January 30, 2018
Wage earnings are the largest source of income for many workers, and wage gains are a primary lever for raising living standards. Reports of stagnant median wages have therefore raised concerns among some that economic growth over the last several decades has not translated into gains for all worker groups. To shed light on recent patterns, this report estimates real (inflation adjusted) wage trends at the 10th, 50th (median), and 90th percentiles of the wage distributions for the workforce as a whole and for several demographic groups, and it explores changes in educational attainment and occupation for these groups over the 1979-2016 period.
[PDF format, 36 pages].
Blockchains Will Change the Way the World Votes. Center for Strategic & International Studies. Phillip Meylan, Daniel F. Runde. January 26, 2018
Amid the clamor around bitcoin’s ascendant (now descendant) value, the potential of a far greater contributor to society has been clouded. Bitcoin—which has in recent months been both the godsend and the bane of speculative investors around the world—is made possible by its underlying blockchain technology. Lauded as a technological innovation on the same magnitude as the internet, blockchains at their simplest are diffuse electronic ledgers that garner efficiency, transparency, and remarkable security through a decentralized structure. You don’t have to understand everything about the underlying technology to see how such a system could have a significant impact on our lives.
Blockchains are now being adopted globally for things as diverse as smart contracts, property rights, health care, and humanitarian assistance. But, blockchains also have enormous potential to revolutionize the way elections are conducted. If implemented correctly, such systems could mobilize new electorates, increase voter participation, reduce election violence, and make elections more secure and reliable than ever before. [Note: contains copyrighted material].
[HTML format, various paging].
Rethinking Cybersecurity: Strategy, Mass Effect, and States. Center for Strategic & International Studies. James Andrew Lewis. January 9, 2018
Despite all the attention, cyberspace is far from secure. Why this is so reflects conceptual weaknesses as much as imperfect technologies. Two questions highlight shortcomings in the discussion of cybersecurity. The first is why, after more than two decades, we have not seen anything like a cyber Pearl Harbor, cyber 9/11, or cyber catastrophe, despite constant warnings. The second is why, despite the increasing quantity of recommendations, there has been so little improvement, even when these recommendations are implemented. [Note: contains copyrighted material].
[PDF format, 50 pages].
The Future of Undergraduate Education, The Future of America. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. December 2017.
What was once a challenge of quantity in American undergraduate education, of enrolling as many students as possible, is increasingly a challenge of educational quality—of making sure that all students receive the education they need to succeed, that they are able to complete the studies they begin, and that they can do all of this affordably, without mortgaging the very future they seek to improve. [Note: contains copyrighted material].
[PDF format, 112 pages, 1.59 MB].
The Future of Truth and Misinformation Online. Pew Research Internet Project. Janna Anderson and Lee Rainie. October 19, 2017
Experts are evenly split on whether the coming decade will see a reduction in false and misleading narratives online. Those forecasting improvement place their hopes in technological fixes and in societal solutions. Others think the dark side of human nature is aided more than stifled by technology. [Note: contains copyrighted material].
[PDF format, 92 pages, 892.12 KB].